RECENT POSTS
Wednesday, August 21, 2019
WeWork Liabilities, Part II

Tuesday, August 20, 2019
WeWork’s Liabilities in Perspective

Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Comparing LinkedIn, Twitter Revenue

Wednesday, August 7, 2019
Leasing’s Effect on Retail Balance Sheets

Thursday, August 1, 2019
Using Calcbench to Find China Exposure

Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Leasing Details: The Comcast Example

Monday, July 29, 2019
Easy Fundamental Equity Analysis in Python

Monday, July 22, 2019
Calcbench Data and Tax Reform Insight

Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Downshifting in the Trucking World

Tuesday, July 16, 2019
New Report: Adoption of New Lease Accounting Standard

Friday, July 5, 2019
More Consequences of Lease Accounting

Monday, July 1, 2019
Another Example of Tax Reform Twisting Bottom Line

Thursday, June 27, 2019
The Latest Share Repurchase Data

Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Popping the Lid on Smuckers’ Goodwill

Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Not Much Fizz in LaCroix Right Now

Wednesday, May 29, 2019
An Example of Calcbench, Excel, and Insight

Monday, May 20, 2019
Research Paper: Capex Spending

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Psst: Got Any Weed?

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Open Letter: SEC Proposed Rule for BDCs

Friday, May 10, 2019
General Motors and Workhorse

Archive  |  Search:

Calcbench takes no formal view on the Trump Administration or politics in general. Corporate filers, however, often do have to say something about what’s happening in Washington and how it might affect their business.

So we decided to investigate: how often does the Trump Administration get cited in corporate filings, anyway?

That is a straightforward exercise on Calcbench, thanks to our Interactive Disclosure database. Typically, companies will cite uncertainty about presidential administrations or congressional legislation in the Risk Factors segment of their disclosures. So we fired up the database, set our search parameters to Risk Factors, and entered “Trump Administration” in the search box.

As one might expect, companies that mention the Administration are rising swiftly: from only two in the third quarter of 2016, to 18 in fourth-quarter 2016, to 67 in first-quarter 2017. Or, in chart form:

Pharmaceutical and healthcare businesses cite the Trump Administration often; no surprise there, given the uncertainty over healthcare reform in the United States right now. Others citing the Trump Administration include businesses with large overseas business (possible tariffs or protectionist trade policies), and Growlife Inc., a “cultivation services provider” eyeing the legalized marijuana industry. Attorney general Jeff Sessions is no fan of legalized marijuana, so Growlife investors may want to smoke ’em while you got ’em.

These disclosures also tend to be non-specific. Take this one, filed by Metlife on May 5:

The Trump Administration has discussed potentially putting in place a tax on goods and services imported into the United States, including from countries in which we have international operations, such as Mexico. President Trump has indicated an interest in renegotiating NAFTA, which had eliminated most trade tariffs between the United States, Canada and Mexico. While our current business in Mexico is not directly dependent upon any specific trade agreement provision, and is tied to the general economy and the growth of the market, if the current rules on government procurement under NAFTA were modified or eliminated, it could have a material impact on our business in Mexico, given our business model…

Accurate? Yes. Informative? We are open to hearing your opinions on that.

To remain nonpartisan, we also looked at companies mentioning “Obama Administration” in the year-earlier period. They went from 33 in third-quarter 2015, to 100 in fourth-quarter 2015, back to 21 in first-quarter 2016.

In the Obama analysis, we saw more energy companies disclosing something (hello Keystone Pipeline, EPA, and Clean Power Plan), along with healthcare companies—and, we could not help but notice, Growlife Inc. again.

That said, in this simple analysis one cannot draw useful comparisons between the Obama and Trump administrations in Risk Factor disclosures. The Trump Administration is new, with a less clear policy agenda. And each administration had policy goals that affected different groups of companies. That is, the Obama Administration had its eye on environmental reform, affecting one group in the energy sector; the Trump Administration is eyeing global trade, eyeing a different group,doing business overseas.

Remember, our goal here was just to show you, the Calcbench subscriber, how you can search the text disclosures companies make in their footnotes. If the Trump Administration is your goal, you might also want to search “President Trump” in the Risk Factors, or both “Trump Administration” and “President Trump” in Management Discussion & Analysis.

You can also search “environmental policy” or “healthcare reform” whatever else catches your fancy. You can search specific industry sectors that might be particularly concerned with political risk right now. Our Interactive Disclosures database is how you do it, and you can drill down to specific disclosures in a snap. Happy digging.

For the true obsessive, you may want to follow @TrumpTrackerBot on Twitter. It scans corporate filings for mention of President Trump, and excerpts them for short blasts on Twitter. It’s also the brainchild of the financial news website ValueWalk.com; kudos to them for creating it.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.