RECENT POSTS
Monday, January 21, 2019
Differences in Earnings Releases and 10-Ks

Wednesday, January 16, 2019
The Importance of Textual Analysis

Tuesday, January 8, 2019
A Look at Climate Change Disclosures

Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Quants: Point-in-Time Data for Backtesting

Friday, December 28, 2018
Now Showing: Controls & Procedures

Thursday, December 27, 2018
A Reminder on Non-GAAP Reporting Rules

Monday, December 17, 2018
Researching PG&E’s Wildfire Risk

Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Tracking Brexit Disclosures

Thursday, December 6, 2018
Campbell Soup: Looking Behind the Label

Sunday, December 2, 2018
SEC Comment Letters: The Amazon Example

Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Measuring Big Pharma’s Chemical Dependency

Monday, November 26, 2018
Analysts, Can You Relate? A True Story

Monday, November 19, 2018
Digging Up Historical Trend Data: Quest Example

Sunday, November 11, 2018
Cost of Revenue, SG&A: Q3 Update

Monday, November 5, 2018
Lease Accounting: FedEx vs. UPS

Saturday, November 3, 2018
New Email Alerting Powers

Wednesday, October 31, 2018
PTC and Two Tales of Revenue

Tuesday, October 30, 2018
10-K/Q Section Text Change Detection

Sunday, October 28, 2018
Finding Purchase Price Allocation

Sunday, October 21, 2018
Charting Netflix Growth in Three Ways

Archive  |  Search:
More Thoughts on CEO Pay Ratios
Monday, April 23, 2018

The trendy new metric for the 2018 proxy season is the CEO pay ratio: a new requirement under Securities and Exchange Commission rules that all companies disclose the ratio of total compensation for the CEO compared to total compensation for the company’s “median employee.”

Calcbench has written a few posts about the CEO pay ratio already. It’s an easy number to find, either by searching a company’s proxy statement in our Interactive Disclosures; or by searching for “CEO Pay Ratio” on our Multi-Company page if you want to see the ratios for numerous companies.

But something Netflix said in its proxy statement, filed this morning, gave us pause—

Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratios, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

On one hand, you would expect a company to say that. Most CEOs make oodles of money, and their CEO pay ratio is commensurately high. (In the case of Netflix, the ratio for CEO Reed Hastings is 133-to-1.) Of course they want to convey a sense that hey, actually, when you do all sorts of math to calculate the median employee, the boss isn’t making that many oodles of money.

On the other hand, Netflix raises a good point: the size of the pay ratio depends on the nature of the company and what the “median” employee does for a living there.

For example, would you consider Netflix an entertainment business that competes against Fox, CBS, and Disney? Or a technology company that competes against Facebook, Google, eBay, and Amazon? If we’re talking about competing for customers, Netflix is closer to the former; if we mean competing for employees, it’s closer to the latter.

You can also see this question arise with Amazon.com, which filed its proxy statement last week. As we noted then, the median employee at Amazon makes only $28,400 annually — because the vast majority of Amazon’s 560,000 employees aren’t tech professionals; they work in warehouses or delivery. (A Wall Street Journal article addressed this very point today. No doubt chasing the high-quality journalism of the Calcbench blog.)

As we’ve said before, whatever company you are researching, you can easily find its peers through our default “Compare to Peer Group” feature or through whatever peer group you select yourself.

But the CEO pay ratio specifically — that one is a bit tricky. As Netflix says, comparing ratios across multiple companies is not as straightforward as it sounds.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.