RECENT POSTS
Wednesday, August 21, 2019
WeWork Liabilities, Part II

Tuesday, August 20, 2019
WeWork’s Liabilities in Perspective

Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Comparing LinkedIn, Twitter Revenue

Wednesday, August 7, 2019
Leasing’s Effect on Retail Balance Sheets

Thursday, August 1, 2019
Using Calcbench to Find China Exposure

Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Leasing Details: The Comcast Example

Monday, July 29, 2019
Easy Fundamental Equity Analysis in Python

Monday, July 22, 2019
Calcbench Data and Tax Reform Insight

Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Downshifting in the Trucking World

Tuesday, July 16, 2019
New Report: Adoption of New Lease Accounting Standard

Friday, July 5, 2019
More Consequences of Lease Accounting

Monday, July 1, 2019
Another Example of Tax Reform Twisting Bottom Line

Thursday, June 27, 2019
The Latest Share Repurchase Data

Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Popping the Lid on Smuckers’ Goodwill

Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Not Much Fizz in LaCroix Right Now

Wednesday, May 29, 2019
An Example of Calcbench, Excel, and Insight

Monday, May 20, 2019
Research Paper: Capex Spending

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Psst: Got Any Weed?

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Open Letter: SEC Proposed Rule for BDCs

Friday, May 10, 2019
General Motors and Workhorse

Archive  |  Search:
More Thoughts on CEO Pay Ratios
Monday, April 23, 2018

The trendy new metric for the 2018 proxy season is the CEO pay ratio: a new requirement under Securities and Exchange Commission rules that all companies disclose the ratio of total compensation for the CEO compared to total compensation for the company’s “median employee.”

Calcbench has written a few posts about the CEO pay ratio already. It’s an easy number to find, either by searching a company’s proxy statement in our Interactive Disclosures; or by searching for “CEO Pay Ratio” on our Multi-Company page if you want to see the ratios for numerous companies.

But something Netflix said in its proxy statement, filed this morning, gave us pause—

Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratios, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

On one hand, you would expect a company to say that. Most CEOs make oodles of money, and their CEO pay ratio is commensurately high. (In the case of Netflix, the ratio for CEO Reed Hastings is 133-to-1.) Of course they want to convey a sense that hey, actually, when you do all sorts of math to calculate the median employee, the boss isn’t making that many oodles of money.

On the other hand, Netflix raises a good point: the size of the pay ratio depends on the nature of the company and what the “median” employee does for a living there.

For example, would you consider Netflix an entertainment business that competes against Fox, CBS, and Disney? Or a technology company that competes against Facebook, Google, eBay, and Amazon? If we’re talking about competing for customers, Netflix is closer to the former; if we mean competing for employees, it’s closer to the latter.

You can also see this question arise with Amazon.com, which filed its proxy statement last week. As we noted then, the median employee at Amazon makes only $28,400 annually — because the vast majority of Amazon’s 560,000 employees aren’t tech professionals; they work in warehouses or delivery. (A Wall Street Journal article addressed this very point today. No doubt chasing the high-quality journalism of the Calcbench blog.)

As we’ve said before, whatever company you are researching, you can easily find its peers through our default “Compare to Peer Group” feature or through whatever peer group you select yourself.

But the CEO pay ratio specifically — that one is a bit tricky. As Netflix says, comparing ratios across multiple companies is not as straightforward as it sounds.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.