RECENT POSTS
Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Popping the Lid on Smuckers’ Goodwill

Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Not Much Fizz in LaCroix Right Now

Wednesday, May 29, 2019
An Example of Calcbench, Excel, and Insight

Monday, May 20, 2019
Research Paper: Capex Spending

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Psst: Got Any Weed?

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Open Letter: SEC Proposed Rule for BDCs

Friday, May 10, 2019
General Motors and Workhorse

Monday, May 6, 2019
How to Find Earnings Release Data

Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Following Restructuring Costs Over Time

Monday, April 22, 2019
Capex Spending: More Than You Might Think

Saturday, April 13, 2019
When AWS Takes Over the World

Thursday, April 11, 2019
Data Trends in Focus: Restructuring Costs

Sunday, April 7, 2019
How One Customer Crushed It With Calcbench

Thursday, April 4, 2019
TJX Shows Complexity of Leasing Costs Reporting

Tuesday, April 2, 2019
CEO Pay Ratios: Some 2018 Thoughts

Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Corporate Spending: Where It Goes, 2017 vs. 2018

Monday, March 25, 2019
Health Insurers: A Bit Winded?

Friday, March 22, 2019
Our New Master Class Video

Thursday, March 21, 2019
Tech Data’s Goodwill Adjustment

Tuesday, March 19, 2019
There’s Taxes, and There’s Taxes

Archive  |  Search:
Casey’s Stores Has Story to Sell
Monday, July 2, 2018

Casey’s General Stores is a chain of convenience stores based in Iowa, with stores across the south and Midwest. Casey’s just filed its annual report last Friday — so today is its turn under the Calcbench microscope to how tax reform is both magnifying and masking its financial performance.

As you can see from the financials below, Casey’s saw annual revenue increase 11.8 percent last year, to nearly $8.4 billion. Alas, cost of goods sold increased even more: 13.7 percent. And this was the second consecutive year where cost of goods sold grew faster than overall revenue.

Further down the income statement, operating expenses grew by 9.44 percent— less than revenue growth (good), but depreciation and interest costs also outpaced revenue (bad). So income before taxes actually fell by 20.5 percent, from $269.67 million last year to $214.4 million this year. See Figure 1, below.

Normally that would leave Casey’s in an uncomfortable situation. Its effective tax rates for the prior two years were 34.1 percent and 35.2 percent, respectively. So if we split the difference and assumed an effective tax rate this year of 34.5 percent, that would lead to net income somewhere around $140.5 million: a decline of about 20.8 percent.

Except, of course, we don’t need to assume any effective tax rate for this year. We have tax reform!

As Casey’s explains in its tax disclosures, last year’s tax reform allowed it to revalue its deferred tax assets and liabilities, resulting in a one-time gain of $173 million. That, in turn, led to a tax benefit of $103 million.

Presto! Casey’s can now report net income of $317.9 million — an increase of 79 percent from last year, even as operating profit fell and the company has more than one expense item growing faster than revenues.

The big question is what Casey’s will do next year, after that one-time gain has ridden into the sunset. The company still has pesky problems with cost of goods sold compared to revenue growth, and other operating expenses within spitting distance of revenue growth, too.

Calcbench users can take that example and compare it to peers, if you follow this sector. Or financial analysts might want to ask about these trends on the next earnings call.

Then again, Casey’s stock has fallen from a high of $127 in January to $96 as recently as June. Maybe they’re already asking.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.