RECENT POSTS
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
A Look at Climate Change Disclosures

Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Quants: Point-in-Time Data for Backtesting

Friday, December 28, 2018
Now Showing: Controls & Procedures

Thursday, December 27, 2018
A Reminder on Non-GAAP Reporting Rules

Monday, December 17, 2018
Researching PG&E’s Wildfire Risk

Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Tracking Brexit Disclosures

Thursday, December 6, 2018
Campbell Soup: Looking Behind the Label

Sunday, December 2, 2018
SEC Comment Letters: The Amazon Example

Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Measuring Big Pharma’s Chemical Dependency

Monday, November 26, 2018
Analysts, Can You Relate? A True Story

Monday, November 19, 2018
Digging Up Historical Trend Data: Quest Example

Sunday, November 11, 2018
Cost of Revenue, SG&A: Q3 Update

Monday, November 5, 2018
Lease Accounting: FedEx vs. UPS

Saturday, November 3, 2018
New Email Alerting Powers

Wednesday, October 31, 2018
PTC and Two Tales of Revenue

Tuesday, October 30, 2018
10-K/Q Section Text Change Detection

Sunday, October 28, 2018
Finding Purchase Price Allocation

Sunday, October 21, 2018
Charting Netflix Growth in Three Ways

Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Interesting Data on Interest Income

Thursday, October 11, 2018
The Decline of Sears in Three Charts

Archive  |  Search:
Dunkin Donuts and the Ice Cream Adjustment
Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Dunkin’ Brands Group — more commonly known as Dunkin Donuts — filed its 2017 Form 10-K this week, including a long discussion of how the new accounting standard for revenue recognition will affect its business.

You may want to pour a fresh cup of coffee for this one. We have a lot to cover.

Dunkin served up more than 850 words of disclosure to investors, plus six tables showing how adoption of the new standard will affect revenues. We’ve seen a few other filers disclose more words, but six tables of data might be a new record.

The company plans to implement the new revenue standard this year, using the “full retrospective method” — that is, it will restate all its 2016 and 2017 revenues to match the new numbers to be reported in 2018. Hence the six tables: income statement, balance sheet, and cash flows, for both 2016 and 2017.

The restated numbers are significant. For example, applying the new standard to fiscal 2017, revenue rose from $860.5 million to $1.27 billion. That’s mostly due to advertising fees from franchisees; the new standard requires them to be reported on the income statement, and they totaled nearly $471 million in 2017.

Then again, the new standard also requires Dunkin to report more advertising expenditures on behalf of franchisees — which put $476 million in new advertising costs onto the income statement, too. So net income actually declines according to the new standard, from $351 million (old standard) to $271.2 million (new).

See Figure 1, below.

Again, Dunkin isn’t “losing” any revenue by adopting the new standard. The standard simply forces companies to recognize revenue in new ways. That can lead to changes (sometimes material ones) in the timing and nature of revenue, but not in the overall amounts of revenue the company sees. A sale is still a sale, after all.

But look! That fourth column from the left! Dunkin also wins the prize for oddest revenue recognition disclosure ever: a $14.3 million adjustment flagged as the ice cream royalty allocation! Let’s go straight to the source:

The adoption of the new guidance will require a portion of sales of ice cream products to be allocated to royalty income as consideration for the use of the franchise license. As such, a portion of sales of ice cream and other products will be reclassified to franchise fees and royalty income in the consolidated statements of operations under the new guidance. This allocation will have no impact on the timing of recognition of the related sales of ice cream products or royalty income.

We have so many questions. When did Dunkin first realize ice cream allocation was a thing? Why no segment reporting for soft serve and standard ice cream? Did Dunkin discuss this with its audit firm? Did they discuss over lunch? Was ice cream on the menu? Did anyone offer an in-kind arrangement, to pay hourly audit fees in ice cream?

Overall, however, Dunkin Brands is a stellar example of how to talk about the new revenue recognition standard. You can find our previous posts about revenue recognition by searching our blog archives, and don’t forget our research papers examining revenue recognition, too! Tax reform may be all the rage right now, but Calcbench will still keep an eye on this issue throughout 2018.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.