RECENT POSTS
Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Not Much Fizz in LaCroix Right Now

Wednesday, May 29, 2019
An Example of Calcbench, Excel, and Insight

Monday, May 20, 2019
Research Paper: Capex Spending

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Psst: Got Any Weed?

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Open Letter: SEC Proposed Rule for BDCs

Friday, May 10, 2019
General Motors and Workhorse

Monday, May 6, 2019
How to Find Earnings Release Data

Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Following Restructuring Costs Over Time

Monday, April 22, 2019
Capex Spending: More Than You Might Think

Saturday, April 13, 2019
When AWS Takes Over the World

Thursday, April 11, 2019
Data Trends in Focus: Restructuring Costs

Sunday, April 7, 2019
How One Customer Crushed It With Calcbench

Thursday, April 4, 2019
TJX Shows Complexity of Leasing Costs Reporting

Tuesday, April 2, 2019
CEO Pay Ratios: Some 2018 Thoughts

Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Corporate Spending: Where It Goes, 2017 vs. 2018

Monday, March 25, 2019
Health Insurers: A Bit Winded?

Friday, March 22, 2019
Our New Master Class Video

Thursday, March 21, 2019
Tech Data’s Goodwill Adjustment

Tuesday, March 19, 2019
There’s Taxes, and There’s Taxes

Saturday, March 16, 2019
Adventures in Tax Cuts and Net Income

Archive  |  Search:

We were looking at the data yesterday when we came across an interesting nugget inside the footnote disclosure of AT&T regarding its potential merger with Time Warner. 

The footnote explains that if the merger were terminated, AT&T would be obligated to pay a fee of $500 million, equivalent to $0.63 a share. Pretty interesting stuff, so naturally we deciced to dive a little deeper.

We wanted to know whether examples of past merger termination fees could give us better understanding of the effects of such, based on previous models.So we took to the XBRL Raw Data Query (explained in this recent blog post) and dove in.

What We Learned

The $500 million breakage fee had been tagged as “LossOnContractTermination.” This is not a common tag, so spotting a few use cases was easy. We took notice of an Aetna and Humana merger with a reported termination fee where Aetna paid Humana $1 billion (contractual), $947 million (net).

This is what that looks like on Humana’s income statement:

As you can see, an additional $947 million had the effect of increasing operating income. By our rough calculations, that was a one-time boost of $6.40 to earnings per share.

We found another case between Staples and Office Depot. The termination fee paid to Office Depot was $250 million.

Here’s what that looks like on Staple’s income statement:

This termination fee was paid in the fiscal second quarter of 2016. Its effect was $0.39 per share. This amount is slightly harder to characterize because Staples recorded a loss in fiscal 2016.

Why This Is Important

Our blog post from Nov. 8 points to an increase in the amount of cash on the balance sheets and on Oct. 23, we showed you that mergers and acquisitions have only increased over the last five years. With cash levels increasing and mergers on the rise, we will also expect termination fees to become more prominent in the immediate future.

To understand the true impact of a merger (or in this case, the lack thereof) you’ll have to look on a case-by-case basis. The good thing is that we offer the tools to do just that. With Calcbench you can enter a rabbit hole without fear of getting lost. We’ve got your back and the data. So, dive into the footnotes with the help of our XBRL Raw Data Query and enjoy the search!


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.