RECENT POSTS
Monday, May 20, 2019
Research Paper: Capex Spending

Thursday, May 16, 2019
Psst: Got Any Weed?

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Open Letter: SEC Proposed Rule for BDCs

Friday, May 10, 2019
General Motors and Workhorse

Monday, May 6, 2019
How to Find Earnings Release Data

Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Following Restructuring Costs Over Time

Monday, April 22, 2019
Capex Spending: More Than You Might Think

Saturday, April 13, 2019
When AWS Takes Over the World

Thursday, April 11, 2019
Data Trends in Focus: Restructuring Costs

Sunday, April 7, 2019
How One Customer Crushed It With Calcbench

Thursday, April 4, 2019
TJX Shows Complexity of Leasing Costs Reporting

Tuesday, April 2, 2019
CEO Pay Ratios: Some 2018 Thoughts

Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Corporate Spending: Where It Goes, 2017 vs. 2018

Monday, March 25, 2019
Health Insurers: A Bit Winded?

Friday, March 22, 2019
Our New Master Class Video

Thursday, March 21, 2019
Tech Data’s Goodwill Adjustment

Tuesday, March 19, 2019
There’s Taxes, and There’s Taxes

Saturday, March 16, 2019
Adventures in Tax Cuts and Net Income

Monday, March 11, 2019
Big Moves in Goodwill, Intangible Value

Friday, March 8, 2019
CVS, Goodwill, and Enterprise Value

Archive  |  Search:
Oh Look, a Non-GAAP Enforcement Action!
Thursday, January 19, 2017

Financial reporting executives might want to know that the Securities and Exchange Commission just dinged a $1 billion marketing firm for faulty non-GAAP reporting—the latest sign that the SEC takes these reporting issues seriously.

The culprit was MDC Partners, based in New York. The SEC fined MDC $1.5 million for two offenses: failing to disclose all CEO perks, and creating a non-GAAP metric called “organic revenue growth” that didn’t pass the smell test.

We’ll put aside the non-disclosure of CEO perks, since that has been a financial reporting no-no for quite a while. The non-GAAP metric, however, is one of the first sanctions we’ve seen since the SEC started talking about possible abuse of non-GAAP reporting last year and vowed an industry crackdown.

So what happened? According to the SEC’s complaint, from 2012 into 2014, MDC started disclosing “organic revenue growth” in its earnings releases. That metric was supposed to be revenue excluding the effects of acquisitions and foreign currency exchange. OK, nothing unusual so far.

In that same period, however, MDC also began reconciling a third item, stemming from a change in its revenue recognition from gross revenue to net revenue, for subsidiaries it owned. MDC never disclosed the existence of that third reconciling item to investors—and full reconciliation of a non-GAAP metric back to its closest GAAP counterpart (in this case, plain old revenue) is required under SEC rules.

To be fair, MDC also flouted a few other SEC reporting rules with other non-GAAP metrics, such as EBITDA, free cash flow, and EBITDA margin. But those violations were more about how MDC emphasized the those metrics in its filings, not about whether metric itself was correct.

We don’t know how much of the $1.5 million in fines stemmed from non-GAAP abuses, versus the failure to disclose CEO perks. Still, the SEC said it was going to crack down on non-GAAP abuses, and now we have proof that it’s doing so.

You can check the Calcbench blog archives for our previous posts about non-GAAP metrics; and our databases do include earnings releases and Form 10-Q quarterly reports with their non-GAAP reconciliation. We suspect this issue won’t go away any time soon in 2017.


FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.