Friday, March 22, 2019
Our New Master Class Video

Thursday, March 21, 2019
Tech Data’s Goodwill Adjustment

Tuesday, March 19, 2019
There’s Taxes, and There’s Taxes

Saturday, March 16, 2019
Adventures in Tax Cuts and Net Income

Monday, March 11, 2019
Big Moves in Goodwill, Intangible Value

Friday, March 8, 2019
CVS, Goodwill, and Enterprise Value

Thursday, February 28, 2019
Summary of Our Goodwill Research/ How-To

Wednesday, February 27, 2019
What Does ‘Other’ Mean? An Example

Thursday, February 21, 2019
Another Tale, Buried in the Footnotes

Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Low Latency Calcbench

Monday, February 11, 2019
Now Streaming on Hulu: Red Ink

Thursday, February 7, 2019
Early Look at 2018 Tax Decline

Wednesday, February 6, 2019
You Revised WHAT, Netflix?

Thursday, January 31, 2019
Talking About Huawei Exposure

Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Another Discrepancy in Reported Numbers

Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Finding Revised Facts: Hertz Edition

Wednesday, January 23, 2019
GE Commercial Aviation Services: Bringing Numbers to Light

Monday, January 21, 2019
Differences in Earnings Releases and 10-Ks

Wednesday, January 16, 2019
The Importance of Textual Analysis

Tuesday, January 8, 2019
A Look at Climate Change Disclosures

Archive  |  Search:
Segment Reporting in the News!
Wednesday, November 16, 2016

You don’t see this often: last week the Securities and Exchange Commission fined a North Carolina energy services company $470,000 for violating the SEC’s segment reporting rules.

The company, PowerSecure International, agreed to pay the penalty without admitting or denying misconduct, and accepted a cease-and-desist order to stop its faulty reporting practices.

What were those faulty practices, exactly? According to the SEC, PowerSecure presented its continuing operations as one reporting segment from 2012 into 2014, when the company should have split those numbers into multiple segments. That violates Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which state that the “chief operating decision manager” should report multiple operating segments when those segments can be identified.

And what is an identifiable operating segment, then? GAAP identifies three factors: (1) the unit can earn revenues and incur expenses; (2) the CODM (yes, that’s the acronym) regularly reviews those results; and (3) the financial information for that segment is discrete from other segments and available to be reported.

Essentially, the SEC said PowerSecure’s CEO bundled all the company’s segments into one big unit and reported those numbers, when the company should have been able to do so. It’s worth noting that in PowerSecure’s annual report for 2015, the company did confess a material weakness in its internal controls related to—you guessed it—segment reporting.

We mention all this today to remind Calcbench users that you can search for and study a company’s segment reporting in our databases. Our Segments, Breakouts, and Rollfowards page lets you search by operating segment (the type that got PowerSecure into trouble), geographic segment (we wrote about how to use the geography tool in August), and more.

Calcbench always strives to provide database capabilities that matter to financial analysts, corporate finance professionals, auditors, academics, and everyone else in the corporate reporting community.

That concludes today’s discussion about segment reporting—and as you can see, getting that right matters.

FREE Calcbench Premium
Two Week Trial

Research Financial & Accounting Data Like Never Before. More features and try our Excel add-in. Sign up now to try the Premium Suite.